Does Social Sharing Equal Public Endorsement?

Does Social Sharing Equal Public Endorsement?

Aug 14, 2012

For whatever reason I have long had disdain for the Social Media users that put the all encompassing quote “Views are my own” within their various social bios/profiles.

It isn’t so much because I don’t believe that the views are their own, but rather the subtlety by which they are saying that they are excusing their respective organization from anything stupid they may say or do. The problem is the world doesn’t work that way. What you do outside of work or on social platforms ultimately are a reflection on all of the communities in which you participate; your workplace being one of them.

It is with this I have long stood by the motto that I will judge (subconsciously of course) your various affiliations by the matter in which you tweet, share, or blog. It may not be fair, but it is life. Those that say they don’t are probably lying to you or themselves. So if you go out and make a fool of yourself on your own time and you later lose your job for it, I won’t feel bad for you.

So when you are sharing online, caution should be drawn because whether you like it or not your stakeholders are being judged by your actions.

With this in mind we should curate and share carefully, because everything we say leaves a footprint in the sands of time.

Well, I have a confession to make.

I don’t read everything I share. I read a lot of it, I skim some of it, and sometimes I just pass it along.

Now before you judge me, hold on. I can’t be the only sane person in the world that does this. With the amount of content that goes out on the interwebs and the gross number of shares that certain sites get, I have a hard time believing that everyone reads every single article. (I think somewhere I can actually hear the silent gasp of a social media purist dropping their jaw right now in disbelief.) But that is okay . I have a plan, and I have purpose. So I share with that in mind.

However, we have come to a bit of a crossroads here. With so much content and so many communities, how do we decide what to share? Further, how should we appropriately explain the demarcation between sharing content and that of a public endorsement.
 

Sharing is Caring

 
As we have all built up what has become our social communities we have set some expectations as to how we engage and share. Some of us are more conversational and chatty while others are much more content based. In some cases this pendulem swings depending on work volume, time of day/year, or just the ever changing commitments that we have.

In my experience I have built a tight knit community around subjects such as leadership, marketing, and technology and there is a tremendous amount of reciprocity built. I have hundreds of members in my triberr community as well as many others whom I reciprocate via guest blogs or other sharing mechanisms.

For the most part they all write good content and I have no issue sharing it within my communities. Having said that, I don’t in all cases agree with the content and in some cases I don’t agree at all. So that is where the question comes into play.
 

But Is it an Endorsement?

 
If what I said above is true and we are all judged based upon the actions we take then a share could be misconstrued for an endorsement.

Why in the world would anyone share something that they don’t like or agree with.

Truth be told the majority of what I share I at least agree with for intent. Some of it I think is interesting, provocative, or different and worth reading. Some portion of it I tend to disagree with but still think it is worth a read.

So for me I don’t necessarily endorse everything that I share, however am I responsible to point that out? So if I share something whether marketing focused or politically charged does that mean I side with the article whether I agree or not?

Does the tweeting of a Huffington Post article make me a liberal? Does the LinkedIn share of a Fox News report make me a staunch conservative?

Personally it just means it is interesting or it is content from someone that I respect. Generally speaking it is only an endorsement if I say specifically that I agree.
 

On The Other Hand

 
So why does it have to specifically be called out as an endorsement before it counts? I mean after all I don’t specifically not endorse everything else.

The fact is there is always to sides of the coin so we can’t neglect the fact that sometimes we will be unfairly associated with the content we share. So keep that in mind when making the decision on the content that you curate.
 

So Is It or Isn’t It?

 
Unfortunately like so many things in life, the answer here isn’t going to be black and white. It is going to come with shades of grey. The fact is with so many eyeballs on everything we do these days we will be constantly judged. So the more important question is do you know whom you are trying to make the best impression for?

For instance, if you are a business owner and you work for yourself (and your customers of course) you may not be opposed to sharing a lot of diverse content with a small risk of offending someone along the way. However if you have a high profile corporate job you may want to be very careful what you put into the social sphere and where your content comes from.

The other big focus should be on your community. I have long heard an expression that you cannot fly with the eagles if you are hanging with the turkey’s. I suggest thinking of your community in a similar way.

If the majority of the people whom you share with/for are people of high moral standards and they put out a good product you can generally be sure that sharing their content comes with low risk. Also if the source is known for good content then you are generally safe as well. I find articles from Mashable, TechCrunch, and Harvard for instance to generally be pretty safe. The problems with only sharing from those sites is that you and every other person that knows how to tweet shares that content.

Of course the only way to be 100% certain to never offend or risk your reputation is to curate everything thoroughly. Read the post, check the links, and then add your input when sharing to make sure you safely and effectively present your view.

If I had the time to do so I would, the problem is I would be lucky to share 2 things a day which would probably not make me all that interesting to follow or engage.

I wonder if anyone will share this without reading? I wish there was an app for that!

Nevertheless, share carefully my friends…

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

10 comments
DivingJon
DivingJon like.author.displayName 1 Like

Great article and yes I did read it :)

I do always read what I share on, but sometimes that is a skim read rather than a full detailed full stop counting exercise. To me, if I pass something on it's an endorsement. If I say it, so is my business - although as you said that's easy in a small firm. 

BruceSallan
BruceSallan like.author.displayName 1 Like

I have a confession too, Daniel...but I think I'd better keep it to myself...

wonderoftech
wonderoftech like.author.displayName 1 Like

Excellent article, Dan, with thought-provoking comments. 1) I have a disclaimer on my Twitter profile because I write a column for a large media company with advertisers. My disclaimer is a courtesy to that media company. It's not required (and wasn't requested), I don't include it because I want to hedge against the possibility that I will post an embarrassing tweet. 2) While I don't read everything I tweet, as I am in Triberr with lots of tribemares. I read articles from my tribemares until I am comfortable enough with their writing that I know I can post it without worrying that it's quality. With some tribemares, I never achieve that level of comfort so I at least check out their articles before I tweet them. 3) My tweets aren't an endorsement that I agree with the position taken in the article. Instead they're an endorsement that I think my followers will find the information interesting.

danielnewmanUV
danielnewmanUV moderator

 @wonderoftech Again - I think in some cases the disclaimer is okay or necessary.  However I don't think it means much to most people.  In terms of 2 you and I are on the same page.  On the last one, that is the question I pose here....but who gets to decide?  Only we as the writer/sharer know, but does that matter if we offend or cause an outrage?

Shonali
Shonali like.author.displayName 1 Like

I love @Wittlake comment but especially how he closed... hahah!

So for me: 1) I have the disclaimer on my Twitter profile because my employer requests me (not personally, all employees) to do so. I think this is just common sense, and I've always had a disclaimer on my blog, both for myself as well as my guest bloggers, even before I went back to FTE. 

2) I used to share without reading, when I had Triberr on auto-share. It was certainly easy, but then I found that I felt uncomfortable when people would ask why I shared a certain piece... because to me, while a share doesn't necessarily constitute endorsement, it does tell me that the sharer found the piece worth sharing. Now I don't share anything I haven't already read (which is why my Triberr shares get backed up, if I haven't had the time to go through it). And if I don't agree with the piece, but find it thought-provoking, I'll still share it, but with some kind of editorial comment.

danielnewmanUV
danielnewmanUV moderator

 @Shonali  @Wittlake In terms of the first part - if your company makes you then I can see why you do it.  I also recognize that if they make you then maybe it is they who don't understand how the world works????

To your second point, I think we all have to be very careful who we "Auto" approve.  But I do believe we can have trusted sources.  We just need to choose wisely!

Wittlake
Wittlake like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

Wow, a lot of good points. I want to share a couple reactions I had to this. 

 

1) My views are not necessarily my employers. Yes, being somewhat active in social media, my views may be public, but what is important is generally far more important is my behavior. If I post that content is overrated as a differentiator and is fast becoming tablestakes for marketers as we are all inundated, you won't likely dismiss my agency for content. In fact, you might even see that we do content creation and see perspectives of individuals around content's evolution as a positive, even if it isn't a position you will see on the agency's website.

 

I'm blogging, tweeting and facebooking in public, with full disclosure of who my employer is. What I say may not be there view, but that doesn't mean I'm not associated with them.

 

2) What is sharing? In my view, it should be an endorsement that it is worth the time to read, watch, fill out, etc. It can be something a disagree with but gives insight into a different perspective. Or can be entertaining, or it can just be so awful that you have to share the misery of having sat through it (with a full disclaimer of course for what it is).

 

This isn't a sense of the right way and the wrong way. It is a perspective I have after following many people and seeing the increasing glut of content. What is valuable to me, and I believe will be increasingly valuable to others as well, is that we are acting as a filter.

 

And a closing note: views are my own, so please don't hold my employer responsible for anything considerate or intelligent I might accidentally say.

 

My $0.02.

danielnewmanUV
danielnewmanUV moderator

 @Wittlake To your first point - I agree and disagree.  If you work for the company you are part of the company.  There is no longer real demarcation there.  Therefore your views to a greater or lesser extend based upon your role do become part of the company.

And...your last line..Classic!

dbvickery
dbvickery like.author.displayName 1 Like

Great points and topic, Dan. I do share some content without reading it because I've had a long enough relationship with the content creator that I understand their viewpoints and communication style. Even if I disagree with some of their content, I know they will present it in a respectful way. In contrast, as people become more polarizing with their content or even their own shares...then I am less likely to share their content without carefully reviewing it first. I might say I have about 10% of the content that I share without reading. Throw in another 35-50% that I skim for details and to see if it is relevant for my audience. The rest I read in great detail because it is of personal interest and/or I intend to leave a comment afterwards. I agree that sharing can imply endorsement. I sometimes put a caveat in a comment that precedes the share...or trust that people who read my content and the content I curate will consider my overall body of work. When it comes down to it, folks know I'm honest and will not exclude other content just because I may disagree with the viewpoint.

danielnewmanUV
danielnewmanUV moderator

 @dbvickery Thanks Brian for your input and honesty here.  I think that this is a big issues and it is something that we all need to be cognizant of.  Everyone is free to do what they choose, but you are also free to be judged no matter how much people shouldn't....Cheers!

Trackbacks

  1. [...] Does Social Sharing Equal Public Endorsement? – Millennial CEO [...]

  2. [...] while the emphasis is on the conversation, some of these numbers are just unmanageable when it comes to connecting in a real way. How can you [...]